Now I'm not saying that a man who is guaranteed to need knee micro-fracture surgery in the next three years was a poor guy to hinge your WR group on... but as many of you may recall, I did.
Other than this obvious problem, the guy is apparently out of shape. He's had work ethic issues in the past, and probably didn't really stay in shape during his last year in Denver. There's a chance that he'll be motivated by his "roster spot" as "Oakland's number one receiver"... which is kind of like having a "seat" on an "airplane on fire"... and get back into shape. Then again, maybe he'll be motivated by his 55 million the other way, and not really try. Time will tell.
The number one argument I hear justifying Oakland's free agency moves is the idea that Oakland has turned into an Arizona of sorts (ie: a place that free agents avoid like the plague) and so they're forced to spend huge amounts of money. Furthermore, that they are a losing team who is pulling at straws to deliver a great team sooner rather than later. This is basically amazingly false on a couple different levels. First of all, Oakland, as a Bay Area team with a rabid fan base, is nowhere near the kind of media black hole that Arizona represents. Secondly, if Oakland actually cared about making a better team they'd build it the right way.. through the draft and solid but unspectacular free agency acquisitions. The fact of the matter is that the only possible way you could justify Oakland's signings is if they expect a non-capped season in 2011. The course they are pursuing is too risky to be called good team management.